• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Publications
  • Podcast

Commentary & Cuentos

Thoughts on Race, Politics, and Pop Culture

November 18, 2015

From the Frontlines of Hillary’s Hispandering

November 18, 2015

Up to this point I have enjoyed or at least been mildly entertained by Hillary Clinton’s hispandering.  Part of it has to do with the fact that she has hired a cadre of creative, adept, and incredibly talented Latinas who craft her Spanish language and Latino-directed messaging.  Her team all but hides Clinton’s ignorance of Latinos in their carefully crafted cloak (dare I say rebozo) of biculturalism.  They turn phrases: “I am not La Hillary, but tu Hillary.”  They make homages: Clinton walked onto stage to none other than the Queen of Tejano music, Selena, at an event in San Antonio.  They tweet in Spanish, participating in #RetroJueves or showing how to say “Go Hillary” in various Spanish dialects.  They forge iconographies: Clinton’s posters at events in Texas evoked images of Eva Perón, to an audience of U.S.-Latinos who might not be familiar with the actual historical person, but are certainly familiar with the musical, sans Madonna or with her.  Her team has wrapped her in the cultural symbols of the community she desired to reach. (Sidenote: If you want to know why La Hillary is doing better with Latinos than Bernie Sanders, one reason is that Clinton hired U.S.-Latinas not just immigrant rights activists.)  But today, my amusement with her pandering to the Latino community stopped.

Hillary Clinton

Clinton traveled to Mountain View College in southwest Dallas, an impoverished and majority-minority area of a town most famously associated with the iconoclastically Texas stereotypes of big hair, big oil, big trucks, and big money.  Yet, this part of Dallas stands apart.  Dallas is 28.8% percent white, 25% African-American, and 42.4% Latino.  The poverty rate is 23.8% across the city, but most of those areas are concentrated in the southern and western parts of the city—the very communities that Mountain View services.  These areas are disproportionately poor and minority and MVC reflects that in its population.  The student population of MVC is, 49.1% Latino, 27% African American, and 15.7% White.

Continue Reading

Posted by Aaron E. Sanchez Leave a Comment
Filed Under: 2016 Presidential Race, Democrats, Education, Politics

October 16, 2015

Why Julian Castro’s Endorsement Matters

October 16, 2015

Julián_Castro's_Official_HUD_Portrait

On October 15, 2015, the last day of Hispanic Heritage Month, Hillary Clinton flew to San Antonio to receive a key endorsement from HUD secretary and rising-star in the Democratic Party, Julian Castro.  Clinton played Selena’s “Bidi Bidi Bom Bom” and spoke Spanish, not much better than a former Democratic presidential hopeful’s wife nearly 55 years ago.  Castro is probably the most prominent Latino politician in the nation, coming out of Texas with its important electoral votes and changing demography.  But other than the fact that a popular Latino politician in the Obama administration endorsed “La Hillary,” why does this matter?

Continue Reading

Posted by Aaron E. Sanchez Leave a Comment
Filed Under: 2016 Presidential Race, Democrats, Politics

September 23, 2015

Hillary’s Stand With Latinos

September 23, 2015

HRC_in_Iowa_APR_2015

Hillary stands with Latinos, apparently.  She wrote an op-ed declaring her solidarity with Latinas/os and she tweets in Spanish.

But, there is still a problem with Hillary’s message.  Her historicity is unmoored which allows for the creation of a happier, rosier, kinder story of the nation.  Instead of delving into the complicated, controversial American past, she provides an exceptionalist vision of America that is misremembered to explain why America has been great, why America is great, and why America will be great in the future.  She writes:

Will we continue to be a country that is proud of our immigrant heritage? That continues to welcome the struggling, the striving, and the successful to our shores? That continues to offer unparalleled opportunities and freedoms to all? Or will we make among the biggest mistakes we could by turning our backs on the world and allowing hatred to turn into policy?

Continue Reading

Posted by Aaron E. Sanchez 1 Comment
Filed Under: 2016 Presidential Race, Democrats, Immigration, Politics

July 19, 2015

Between Paleoliberalism and Neoliberalism: Latinos’ Past and Future

July 19, 2015

hillaryclinton7-18

Judging by the changing prefixes—paleo, neo, new paleo—it would seem that American liberalism is in flux.  In her most recent and most touted economic address, Hillary Clinton has returned to the liberal belief in government intervention, probably pushed there by Bernie Sanders.  Her speech has received attention but not necessarily celebration.  She has been criticized for not addressing income inequality with redistribution policies.  In a very smart essay, Matthew Yglesias called Clinton a “new paleoliberal.” That is, she has revived some very important beliefs of a pre-Reagan era that saw its highpoint between 1963-1968 in the LBJ administration.  Namely, Clinton believes that government can be part of the solution and the market has been part of the larger problem of increasing economic inequality in the post-1970s U.S.  David Brooks of the New York Times wrote that Clinton’s belief in government solutions was “epistemologically naïve” and politically unwise.  Brooks reasons that voters no longer believe that the government can solve the big problems the nation is facing.  This is true, in part.  Americans’ optimism in the government has waned since the 1970s, with cynicism spread by both the left and the right.

Clinton’s renewed optimism in government backed solutions to systemic problems is important for the Latina/o community because in a poll conducted for UNIVISION Noticias she leads the presidential pack in the Latino community.  Clinton would receive 64 percent of the general Latino vote, while the closest Republican hopeful, Jeb Bush, would only receive 27 percent.  Among Latino Democrats, she has 73% of the vote, while her contenders are largely unknown (68 percent did not know or had not formed an opinion of Bernie Sanders and 74 percent did not know or had not formed an opinion of Martin O’Malley).

Continue Reading

Posted by Aaron E. Sanchez Leave a Comment
Filed Under: 2016 Presidential Race, Democrats, Politics

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
An intellectual historian bringing context and perspective to contemporary issues.

Search

Subscribe Via Email

Topics

  • 2016 Presidential Race
  • Chicano Studies
  • Conservatism
  • Democrats
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Faith
  • Fatherhood
  • History
  • Immigration
  • Politics
  • Popular Culture
  • Race
  • Republicans
  • Uncategorized

Look Around

  • About
  • Contact
  • Twitter

Popular Posts

An Elegy for Juan Gabriel
The Republicans’ Latino Problem
In American Politics, Se Habla Español

Theme by 17th Avenue · Powered by WordPress & Genesis